<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for My Tech World</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mytechworld.officeacuity.com/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mytechworld.officeacuity.com</link>
	<description>Views on Web Technology and Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 09:57:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Event Binding with jQuery delegate() by Phil</title>
		<link>http://mytechworld.officeacuity.com/?p=592&#038;cpage=1#comment-1267</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 09:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mytechworld.officeacuity.com/?p=592#comment-1267</guid>
		<description>Honestly?  It probably would. I can&#039;t remember if there was a reason I structured it that way.  If I can find time, I&#039;ll code the two up and measure their performance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly?  It probably would. I can&#8217;t remember if there was a reason I structured it that way.  If I can find time, I&#8217;ll code the two up and measure their performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Event Binding with jQuery delegate() by Jesse Rosato</title>
		<link>http://mytechworld.officeacuity.com/?p=592&#038;cpage=1#comment-1266</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Rosato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 22:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mytechworld.officeacuity.com/?p=592#comment-1266</guid>
		<description>Just wondering, why use &#039;each()&#039; in your &#039;live()&#039; example?  Wouldn&#039;t $(&#039;table td&#039;).live() work the same?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wondering, why use &#8216;each()&#8217; in your &#8216;live()&#8217; example?  Wouldn&#8217;t $(&#8216;table td&#8217;).live() work the same?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Embedding a Twitter Feed Using jQuery by design web london</title>
		<link>http://mytechworld.officeacuity.com/?p=393&#038;cpage=1#comment-1264</link>
		<dc:creator>design web london</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 11:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mytechworld.officeacuity.com/?p=393#comment-1264</guid>
		<description>but what about when i need to show my own database updates in real time like twitter ? any suggestions</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but what about when i need to show my own database updates in real time like twitter ? any suggestions</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Create a Word Glossary by John</title>
		<link>http://mytechworld.officeacuity.com/?p=140&#038;cpage=1#comment-1252</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mytechworld.officeacuity.com/?p=140#comment-1252</guid>
		<description>I am using Acronyms Master to build a glossary. It is a real time saver.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am using Acronyms Master to build a glossary. It is a real time saver.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on JQuery UI, CSS and IE by Phil</title>
		<link>http://mytechworld.officeacuity.com/?p=313&#038;cpage=1#comment-1231</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 23:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mytechworld.officeacuity.com/?p=313#comment-1231</guid>
		<description>I feel your pain.  Really, I do.  But it is not the place of designers or developers to rise up and arrive at the door of anyone using Internet Explorer with pitchforks and torches.  The fact of the matter is that IE is still used by well over 60% of the global market and abandoning support for that sort of market share is simply impractical.

You may find that your users are split more proportionately with their browser share, but you should still consider IE into your equation - either by providing gentle guidance on how to upgrade / move to a different vendor, or at least explaining why things might look funny when viewed in IE6.

As IE6 continues to age and fall behind current web standards, more companies are recognising the need to send it back to the world of shadow and flame from whence it came.  This coupled with Microsoft&#039;s realisation that IE needs to be generally better than it has in the past means that our lot as developers / designers is destined to improve - and soon.

By the way, Google has dropped support for older versions of IE for some products (e.g. YouTube).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel your pain.  Really, I do.  But it is not the place of designers or developers to rise up and arrive at the door of anyone using Internet Explorer with pitchforks and torches.  The fact of the matter is that IE is still used by well over 60% of the global market and abandoning support for that sort of market share is simply impractical.</p>
<p>You may find that your users are split more proportionately with their browser share, but you should still consider IE into your equation &#8211; either by providing gentle guidance on how to upgrade / move to a different vendor, or at least explaining why things might look funny when viewed in IE6.</p>
<p>As IE6 continues to age and fall behind current web standards, more companies are recognising the need to send it back to the world of shadow and flame from whence it came.  This coupled with Microsoft&#8217;s realisation that IE needs to be generally better than it has in the past means that our lot as developers / designers is destined to improve &#8211; and soon.</p>
<p>By the way, Google has dropped support for older versions of IE for some products (e.g. YouTube).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on JQuery UI, CSS and IE by Senica Gonzalez</title>
		<link>http://mytechworld.officeacuity.com/?p=313&#038;cpage=1#comment-1224</link>
		<dc:creator>Senica Gonzalez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 02:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mytechworld.officeacuity.com/?p=313#comment-1224</guid>
		<description>When will we as designers take a stand against Internet Explorer?  It is such a pain.   I have not met one fellow designer/programmer who has not lost money due to that horrific excuse for a program.  What would it take for us to unite and put a stop towards development for internet explorer?  This is a serious question by the way.  It is a matter of getting a better browser to this &quot;majority&quot; of web users?  What is it?  What would it take?  Would it take a company like Google finally saying they don&#039;t support it anymore?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When will we as designers take a stand against Internet Explorer?  It is such a pain.   I have not met one fellow designer/programmer who has not lost money due to that horrific excuse for a program.  What would it take for us to unite and put a stop towards development for internet explorer?  This is a serious question by the way.  It is a matter of getting a better browser to this &#8220;majority&#8221; of web users?  What is it?  What would it take?  Would it take a company like Google finally saying they don&#8217;t support it anymore?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Serializing Entity Framework Objects into JSON Using ASP.Net MVC by Phil</title>
		<link>http://mytechworld.officeacuity.com/?p=577&#038;cpage=1#comment-1205</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 09:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mytechworld.officeacuity.com/?p=577#comment-1205</guid>
		<description>Glad to know.  Thanks for the kind words and I&#039;m happy to hear it&#039;s working for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to know.  Thanks for the kind words and I&#8217;m happy to hear it&#8217;s working for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Serializing Entity Framework Objects into JSON Using ASP.Net MVC by davidrenz.com &#187; Serializing Entity Framework Objects into JSON using ASP.NET MVC</title>
		<link>http://mytechworld.officeacuity.com/?p=577&#038;cpage=1#comment-1178</link>
		<dc:creator>davidrenz.com &#187; Serializing Entity Framework Objects into JSON using ASP.NET MVC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 17:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mytechworld.officeacuity.com/?p=577#comment-1178</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Serializing Entity Framework Objects into JSON Using ASP.Net MVC by david renz</title>
		<link>http://mytechworld.officeacuity.com/?p=577&#038;cpage=1#comment-1177</link>
		<dc:creator>david renz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 17:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mytechworld.officeacuity.com/?p=577#comment-1177</guid>
		<description>thanks! 
that is EXACTLY what i needed.

all those circular reference workarounds out there were just overkill ... this works great!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks!<br />
that is EXACTLY what i needed.</p>
<p>all those circular reference workarounds out there were just overkill &#8230; this works great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on JQuery UI, CSS and IE by siva</title>
		<link>http://mytechworld.officeacuity.com/?p=313&#038;cpage=1#comment-1096</link>
		<dc:creator>siva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 23:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mytechworld.officeacuity.com/?p=313#comment-1096</guid>
		<description>as a developer these days we get requirement in the morning and we have to give the demo in the evening..in this rapid pace developer cannot sit to find a workaround for inconsistency created by frameworks, none has that much BW..we believe coming rel of jquery should give us some standard solun for this out of the box..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as a developer these days we get requirement in the morning and we have to give the demo in the evening..in this rapid pace developer cannot sit to find a workaround for inconsistency created by frameworks, none has that much BW..we believe coming rel of jquery should give us some standard solun for this out of the box..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
